Home
About Us
Bouncy Castles
Children's Parties
Garden Games
Guestbook
Contact Us
Tell A Friend
The Smile High Company
Useful Links
News
Code of Conduct
Hire Agreement


Latest News

Bouncy Castle Boy Awarded Damages (May 08, 2008)
The following news story was featured in the national news in May 2008. The British Inflatable Hirers Alliance has issued an official statement as follows:
 
"Bouncy castles are extremely safe for children to play on so long as precautions are taken such as continuous supervision.

This accident, although tragic, is extremely rare as demonstrated by the fact that there are approx. 1 Million bouncy castle hires in the UK, and this is very much a one off incident.

Parents who hire bouncy castles should normally be covered by their household insurance policy (Home contents), although it is wise to check the details to find out exactly what is covered, and contact their insurance company if they are in any doubt.

Operators should carry adequate Public Liability Insurance cover (Minimum £1 million) in case of faulty equipment.

To put this incident into context, according to RoSPA figures, in 2002, there were almost 4 times as many accidents on trampolines as there were on bouncy castles."
 

(Taken from the BBC News website)

A teenager left brain damaged after being kicked on a bouncy castle has won his damages claim against the parents who hired it for their triplets' party.

Sam Harris, now 13, of Spalding, Lincolnshire, suffered a broken skull when a 15-year-old boy kicked his head at the party in Strood, Kent, in 2005.

Mr Justice David Steel said Timothy and Catherine Perry, who hired the castle, had not provided enough supervision.

Damages, for which Mr and Mrs Perry are insured, are likely to exceed £1m.

The incident is likely to be covered through a normal home insurance policy.

The High Court had heard Sam sustained a "very serious and traumatic brain injury" and now needed round-the-clock supervision.

Sam brought the case against the Perrys through his mother Janet, of Long Lane, Gedney Hill.
 
A claim by the couple that Sam's father David Harris was to blame for the accident, on playing fields behind their home in Jersey Road, was dismissed.
 

Sam was hurt when the much taller 15-year-old boy caught the left side of his head with his heel while somersaulting on the castle.

Counsel for Mr and Mrs Perry said Mr Harris should have ensured his son, who has Asperger syndrome, did not go anywhere near the inflatable.

The judge said he found it probable that Mrs Perry did give Sam permission to use the castle but that the level of supervision was inadequate.

He gave the Perrys permission to appeal because of the ruling's "potential significance" to anyone operating inflatable equipment.

He added that if the appeal was not pursued, Sam should receive an interim payment of £100,000.

Specialist support

Mr and Mrs Harris, who are separated, said after the hearing their only motivation in pursuing the case was to obtain damages for their son.

"We are both very relieved that the court has found that Mr and Mrs Perry were negligent as this will now enable us to obtain the specialist support and treatment that Sam needs," they said in a statement.

"Whilst we never wanted the case to conclude at trial, we are pleased that this has provided an opportunity to highlight just how dangerous bouncy castles can be if they are not supervised properly.

"We appreciate that thousands of children enjoy playing on bouncy castles every year and we would not wish to stop that happening.

"But it is vital that those hiring them supervise them properly if accidents like Sam's are to be avoided."

Mrs Harris added: "It has been such a struggle.

"The damages he will receive will hopefully help to improve his quality of life."

Click here to return to the News page


To contact us with your enquiry please telephone 07908 695543

Powered by Create